tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18537763668450314792024-03-12T19:56:28.623-05:00Neal and Rachel's Wisconsin Adventures!Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.comBlogger514125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-81843483565767158792014-07-26T22:15:00.002-05:002014-07-26T22:59:31.604-05:00Weird Al 201You probably don't need Weird Al 101. Odds are good you know your "<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOfZLb33uCg">Amish Paradise</a>," your "<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9qYF9DZPdw">White and Nerdy</a>," your "<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FklUAoZ6KxY">Smells Like Nirvana</a>," and of course your "<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcJjMnHoIBI">Eat It</a>." Perhaps you could even test out of Weird Al 123, if you're familiar with some non-lead singles, like "<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvUZijEuNDQ">I Lost on Jeopardy</a>," "<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpMvS1Q1sos">It's All About the Pentiums</a>," or "<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPyxstgk8oM">Yoda</a>."<br />
<br />
But it's time to get down to business, students. It's time we tackled some Weird Al original songs.<br />
<br />
First thing we discuss after going over the syllabus is that half of Al's songs are not parodies. Every other song on every album is a song he wrote the music for. These are, usually, "style parodies," written to sound like a particular band or maybe just to fit into a genre.<br />
<br />
Let's begin.<br />
<br />
Would you care for a song about an internal organ, written in the style of the <i>Pet Sounds</i>-era Beach Boys? Of course you would. ("Pancreas," 2006)<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/tqDBB0no6dQ" width="420"></iframe>
<br />
<br />
How about a song written only in palindromes? ("Bob," 2003)<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/JUQDzj6R3p4" width="420"></iframe>
<br />
<br />
Al admits that "One More Minute" (1985) is about a real breakup--I don't know what it says about me as a person that I think that makes it funnier. <br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/yWhpk-8QLFQ" width="420"></iframe>
<br />
<br />
"Truck Drivin' Song" (1999) may not even be the best original song on <i>Running with Scissors, </i>but it's the only Weird Al song (I can think of) that features steel guitar.<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/FZSBrM2SybY" width="420"></iframe>
<br />
<br />
Finally, if I had to pick a favorite Weird Al song, this is it: the "Generic Blues." (1989)<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/P58wQ92qFj8" width="420"></iframe>
<br />
Good job today, class. See you next time.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-16464635796914095522013-06-07T15:03:00.000-05:002013-06-07T16:21:56.896-05:00And now for your Bummer Book of the Day!<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Night-Expect-Someone-Lifes-Challenges/dp/1404866795">The Night Dad Went to Jail</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51CBnSISLQL._SY300_.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51CBnSISLQL._SY300_.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
:( :( :( Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-24358980916956467692013-06-06T22:10:00.001-05:002013-06-06T22:10:44.011-05:00Because Madison.The other day I was walking through a residential neighborhood when I saw a guy on a bike, hauling a tiny wagon (yes, a specially-modified bike-trailer wagon) with two tiny bales of hay in it. And I was unsurprised, because Madison.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-30261303729387765782013-06-04T21:52:00.000-05:002013-06-04T21:54:48.509-05:00A Library ConversationExtremely Flustered Lady: I tried to use the computer, but someone is using my name!<br />
<br />
Me: . . . What?<br />
<br />
EFL: I tried to use the computer, but <i>someone </i>is <i>using my name!</i><br />
<br />
Me: OK, what were you trying to do?<br />
<br />
EFL: Use the computer!!<br />
<br />
Me: You tried to do <i>what </i>on the computer?<br />
<br />
EFL: Email!<br />
<br />
Me: You tried to sign in to your email?<br />
<br />
EFL: NO! I wanted to make one!<br />
<br />
Me: You wanted to sign up for an email account?<br />
<br />
EFL: YES, but <i>someone </i>is <i>using </i>my name!!!<br />
<br />
Me: Were you trying to sign up for a Gmail account?<br />
<br />
EFL: Yes!<br />
<br />
Me: And you wanted to use your name, but it wasn't available?<br />
<br />
EFL: Yes.<br />
<br />
Me: OK, with big companies like that, there are just so many people using them that someone with your same name already signed up. Try using your name with a number that's significant to you.<br />
<br />
EFL: All right. [Walks away with no further questions, entirely satisfied]Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-18892227785237015632012-08-30T16:41:00.001-05:002012-08-30T16:51:34.785-05:00Merry Football, Everyone!Today is, mercifully, the beginning of the college football season (and more mercifully, the end of The Worst Offseason Ever). There are many interesting topics I could cover here--this year will see the long-awaited Return of the Leach, for one thing--but let's just do the basics. Let's make sure we all know who's in which conference.<br />
<br />
Teams new to the conference will be *ed. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYF2gxCaZ20q0y8BxcsJfnHT63gGzzXZ39yaVK0VX3yF6tPkrdK_wHlF-R6x7VzkY0My_I8zljdciSNknnHL3J_K9t8ijh3tIUvGvDUbPi4iLJDqUQyzaCng8xge7MtlMh4PGulzoLIfm0/s1600/Google+SEC.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="338" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYF2gxCaZ20q0y8BxcsJfnHT63gGzzXZ39yaVK0VX3yF6tPkrdK_wHlF-R6x7VzkY0My_I8zljdciSNknnHL3J_K9t8ijh3tIUvGvDUbPi4iLJDqUQyzaCng8xge7MtlMh4PGulzoLIfm0/s400/Google+SEC.PNG" width="400" /></a></div>
<u><b>SEC</b></u><br />
<b>West </b><br />
Alabama<br />
Arkansas<br />
Auburn<br />
LSU<br />
Ms. State<br />
Ole Miss<br />
Texas A&M*<br />
<br />
<b>East</b><br />
Florida<br />
Georgia<br />
Kentucky<br />
Missouri*<br />
South Carolina<br />
Tennessee<br />
Vanderbilt <br />
<br />
As you can see, the divisions are really more Southwest/Northeast, but calling an SEC division "Northeast" would be untenably hilarious.<br />
<br />
I still have mixed feelings about the Ags being here. I am pro the money, the increased TV exposure (both for recruiting and my own personal ability to see more games), but I have not convinced my brain yet that I am an SEC fan. It's weird. Also, if we had to bring somebody from the old clubhouse, why Missouri (other than as a sacrifice to Almighty TV Footprint, of course)? They're so . . . blah.<br />
<br />
I also have mixed feelings about the La Tech postponement. Obviously, you have to be careful about the weather, but it's too bad the Ags aren't going to have a bye week. On the other hand, I was not convinced we were going to walk into La Tech's own stadium and walk out with a win. If our season is going to start on an embarrassing defeat, better for the victor to be Florida than the best of the seven teams in the WAC.<br />
<br />
<b>Team to watch: </b> The Ags, obviously. Be sure to bring your high pain tolerance, though.<br />
<br />
<u><b>Big Ten</b></u><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqXFufrXTwzH2zPXrX8q0Daq1jOKR8XIbOPGmCBj3qU7ETjNMwEYySQVgMu_UNGK5eu1Nzorv1pE0fWvny8DEJzuzu5O7-i_Bt4b58v80Rs9L9d26gkX-h30sJekyw_9Umj1zrZqKrFrAB/s1600/Google+Big+Ten.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="208" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqXFufrXTwzH2zPXrX8q0Daq1jOKR8XIbOPGmCBj3qU7ETjNMwEYySQVgMu_UNGK5eu1Nzorv1pE0fWvny8DEJzuzu5O7-i_Bt4b58v80Rs9L9d26gkX-h30sJekyw_9Umj1zrZqKrFrAB/s400/Google+Big+Ten.PNG" width="400" /></a></div>
<b>"Leaders"</b><br />
Illinois<br />
Indiana<br />
Ohio State<br />
Penn State<br />
Purdue<br />
Wisconsin<br />
<br />
<b>"Legends"</b><br />
Iowa<br />
Michigan<br />
Michigan State<br />
Minnesota<br />
Nebraska<br />
Northwestern<br />
<br />
Even though the Big Ten didn't add anyone this year, they are still entering a brave new world. One of the conference's premier brands, Penn State, will not be competitive for a very, very long time. The number of scholarships they'll have in upcoming years will basically make them an FCS school in an FBS conference. In the short term, that combined with Ohio State's postseason ban makes the "Leaders" race pretty unsuspenseful. If Wisconsin doesn't win a division where half of teams are ineligible or Indiana, something has gone terribly wrong for them. (This also shows why trying to split a conference by competitive balance is folly. You never know what the future holds, so you might as well just use geography.)<br />
<br />
And of course, these are still the worst division names in the history of dividing things. (Rece Davis did give me this handy hint, though: LegeNds is made up of Ms, Ns, and Iowa. That still leaves me coming up with "Leaders" by subtraction, but it's better than nothing.)<br />
<br />
<b>Team to watch: </b>The Badgers, why not? They've got <i>another </i>senior ACC transfer QB, since that worked pretty well last time. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJXU9_3Ix3fd-kmFpPMc10mntbLG7NFnWhwhf4xxYG8INe3YVrGhTa3ZXt3sOq1nxlLPGfsavfNkwWyTf-CoT_5lOntZPjdnR-h2UBrY-gXDTpjXL00mFnSW37dkHutTqCjBkYqF83TEvi/s1600/Google+Big+12.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="317" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJXU9_3Ix3fd-kmFpPMc10mntbLG7NFnWhwhf4xxYG8INe3YVrGhTa3ZXt3sOq1nxlLPGfsavfNkwWyTf-CoT_5lOntZPjdnR-h2UBrY-gXDTpjXL00mFnSW37dkHutTqCjBkYqF83TEvi/s400/Google+Big+12.PNG" width="400" /></a></div>
<u><b>Big 12 </b></u><br />
Baylor<br />
Iowa State<br />
KU<br />
K-State<br />
Oklahoma<br />
Oklahoma State<br />
texas<br />
TCU* <br />
Texas Tech<br />
West Virginia*<br />
<br />
Yes, still ten teams in the Big 12 and twelve teams in the Big Ten. Up is down, left is right, and Charlie Weis is the right man to rebuild a college football program.<br />
<br />
I don't feel about the Big 12 the way I would about an ex-boyfriend--no, more like I would about a good friend's ex-boyfriend. I know I'm going to see him around, probably with his sketchy new girlfriend (West Virginia), and it's not going to be heart-wrenching, but it is going to be pretty awkward.<br />
<br />
<b>Team to watch: </b>K-State's success last year defied logic, so I'm interested to see if it's at all repeatable. In any event, Bill Snyder Part II is going <i>much </i>better than I thought it would. <br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCYp4ABh_WTx2Y8dSfZp2Ae-BZRkNzIlv0dJs6MK-bhxkQ5XfAozzdLjIvmOAFjreZBDZtYuxBC5hMXffBLZvhp38uD7sm6O09Qy34VcBu6WR8ziDjPRG1BhRDh-W2RbMvqI6MFSHCyzev/s1600/google+pac+12.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="356" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCYp4ABh_WTx2Y8dSfZp2Ae-BZRkNzIlv0dJs6MK-bhxkQ5XfAozzdLjIvmOAFjreZBDZtYuxBC5hMXffBLZvhp38uD7sm6O09Qy34VcBu6WR8ziDjPRG1BhRDh-W2RbMvqI6MFSHCyzev/s400/google+pac+12.PNG" width="400" /></a><u><b>Pac-12</b></u><br />
<b>North</b><br />
Cal<br />
Oregon<br />
Oregon State<br />
Stanford<br />
Washington<br />
Washington State<br />
<br />
<b>South</b><br />
Arizona <br />
Arizona State<br />
Colorado<br />
UCLA<br />
USC<br />
Utah<br />
<br />
Now, I like these Pac-12 divisions. Sure, they play a little fast and loose with "north" and "south" when you get to northern California vs. Utah and Colorado, but still! It makes sense.<br />
<br />
Last year was the first roll-out of the Pac with Utah and Colorado, and of the divisions, but this year will probably be a better showcase for them. Remember, because USC's bowl ineligibility, 6-6 UCLA got to go to the inaugural Pac-12 championship game, which was ludicrous. Utah and Colorado should be better (although in Colorado's case, they almost have to be), so that should help too.<br />
<br />
<b>Team to watch: </b>This is not a hard question. It's Washington State, because MIKE LEACH IS BACK, BABY! I can't wait for all the insane post-game interviews. I'm so excited.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgl8oKnXlCFOv-Oz8zZ1ZehHZ9lPc4ERHsmDqaWBmqJZKMIOgnE6otFC04yKJd6THTFgA6OUrTW9yWJJM_N260o2IJUIScaZ3ntveqiUvASg1sa8u7VrRza7RYKS4MX7zseiuOhoL4kPWOu/s1600/Google+ACC.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="400" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgl8oKnXlCFOv-Oz8zZ1ZehHZ9lPc4ERHsmDqaWBmqJZKMIOgnE6otFC04yKJd6THTFgA6OUrTW9yWJJM_N260o2IJUIScaZ3ntveqiUvASg1sa8u7VrRza7RYKS4MX7zseiuOhoL4kPWOu/s320/Google+ACC.PNG" width="298" /></a></div>
<u><b>ACC</b></u><br />
<b>Atlantic </b><br />
Boston College<br />
Clemson<br />
Florida State<br />
Maryland<br />
NC State<br />
Wake Forest<br />
<br />
<b>Coastal</b><br />
Duke<br />
Georgia Tech<br />
Miami (FL [obviously])<br />
North Carolina<br />
Virginia<br />
Virginia Tech<br />
<br />
I'm not going to lie to you--if I were given a pop quiz on ACC divisions, I'd probably score like 25%. These are the original geographically meaningless divisions, but at least I can physically speak their names without rolling my eyes/doing air quotes, <i>Big Ten.</i><br />
<br />
The ACC looks deceptively stable here, but next year they're joining the ranks of the 14-team conferences, as we'll see more about very soon.<br />
<br />
Also, sorry about the map. The Raleigh-Durham area has a ridiculous number of Div I schools.<br />
<br />
<b>Team to watch:</b> Florida State is getting hype again, but I'll believe they're contenders when I see it. I always like Va Tech, but I'm going to be taking a greater interest in Virginia. One of my friends got hired as a professor there! So Wahoo-wah, apparently. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiib-MoMGM4RtgyeTQAbkdK6SmfTn752spQgtMlCsMWnR3PvG-9F1LL_T3MBZgHQXoHNWY_NBu0eOFJW1IVtzeu-3eJokCTcz_jZ5rgaQRP5ZW7dIYtBaLbg1JdturHNqCU1Fqvrg2gj43-/s1600/Google+Big+East+12.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiib-MoMGM4RtgyeTQAbkdK6SmfTn752spQgtMlCsMWnR3PvG-9F1LL_T3MBZgHQXoHNWY_NBu0eOFJW1IVtzeu-3eJokCTcz_jZ5rgaQRP5ZW7dIYtBaLbg1JdturHNqCU1Fqvrg2gj43-/s200/Google+Big+East+12.PNG" width="158" /></a></div>
<b><u>Big East</u></b><br />
Cincinnati<br />
Louisville<br />
Pittsburgh<br />
Rutgers<br />
Syracuse<br />
Temple* <br />
UConn<br />
USF<br />
<br />
This year, the Big East lost West Virginia and subbed in former member Temple. Next year, they're losing Pitt and Syracuse and are wildly overcompensating for it.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqG0-a_dpQZWLMHHUNeUvcw5OHsvwxMtf3NhrlnDihar_quzMEaUOhIFtG2ONV8gP4839j0i4cmKfQHq2B8aEziOYTsH0vb8x1hCgjJzPe_73rdCayGVgDh9gGFy_9VZNa06JjE4hDnIX7/s1600/Google+Big+East+13.PNG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="344" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgqG0-a_dpQZWLMHHUNeUvcw5OHsvwxMtf3NhrlnDihar_quzMEaUOhIFtG2ONV8gP4839j0i4cmKfQHq2B8aEziOYTsH0vb8x1hCgjJzPe_73rdCayGVgDh9gGFy_9VZNa06JjE4hDnIX7/s640/Google+Big+East+13.PNG" width="640" /></a></div>
Why yes, that is a map of the entire United States! In 2013, the Big "East" will include Memphis, Central Florida, Houston, SMU, Boise State, and San Diego State. The lesson of conference realignment is this: whether you name your conference with a number or a direction, it'll be wrong sooner or later. (Oh, and I shudder to think what <i>those </i>divisions could look like.)<br />
<br />
Seriously though, it's a little tragic that the Big East cast out so desperately for members to try to keep their automatic bid status, just before college football decided to switch to a system without automatic bids. Oh, Big East.<br />
<br />
<b>Team to watch: </b>Realignment-wise, Temple is a feel-good story. To quote Phil Steele in his eponymous preview magazine, "Coming in '09, the Owls had not had winning season in an amazing 18 str yrs and in '08 they topped 4 wins for the first time s/'90. The Big East booted Temple out after the '04 ssn." (I left Phil's abbreviations intact because they amuse me.) Temple did better once they got into the MAC, clawing their way into respectability. So when West Virginia left the Big East in the lurch, it was obvious who they should call.<br />
<br />
And that ties in to the overarching theme of this post: conference realignment: she's a fickle mistress. Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-77105603453744410392012-04-04T23:25:00.002-05:002012-04-04T23:29:19.043-05:00I Could Win a Prize!<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW01aj21bPplSyYLnnbYQTjkgWVa1a70hniiJWrFzug-8uTHin65A5y4oawbWit_VGfuXcJL63FjSNtvzDQCB6kVngvSzqAS7KfcHSux5_uwGKJ5DdJLhVYJz5z2VFbfXIZ5K1q3LhcTIm/s1600/tea+story.png"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 226px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhW01aj21bPplSyYLnnbYQTjkgWVa1a70hniiJWrFzug-8uTHin65A5y4oawbWit_VGfuXcJL63FjSNtvzDQCB6kVngvSzqAS7KfcHSux5_uwGKJ5DdJLhVYJz5z2VFbfXIZ5K1q3LhcTIm/s400/tea+story.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5727768174018830194" border="0" /></a>Guys! Twinings is having a tea story contest!!! Do you think I should enter my <a href="http://rachel-adventures.blogspot.com/2010/03/tea-report.html">Lapsang Souchong one</a>?!Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-39034038140075147652012-02-16T17:09:00.000-06:002012-02-16T17:37:38.541-06:00My New JobLast month, I stopped working at The Library and am now working at The School. I made the switch for cash money reasons, since I was working at the library part-time without benefits, but I don't begrudge the decision on professional-fulfillment grounds, because I think it's going pretty well.<br /><br />I'm a special education assistant at an elementary school. Specifically, I help this little bro who is in the fourth grade and has autism. He's extremely interesting, fitting stereotypes about autism in some ways and not at all in others. I don't want to talk about him <span style="font-style: italic;">too </span>much on the internet (although I'll probably answer questions if you have them in the comments), but I will say that he's almost nonverbal, meaning that there are some ways that I draw on my past experience of babycare to work with him; at the same time, there's plenty he can do and understand. (And he is just as physically able as any of his classmates.) We're working on fundamentals of math and reading, and he's learned a noticeable amount in both areas just since I started working with him. Needless to say, that's really awesome.<br /><br />I also work some with the other kids in my lad's class, either generally trying to help when he's with the group, or during a segment in the middle of the day where the special ed teacher works with my lad. And I have to say, it's <span style="font-style: italic;">so </span>much more challenging to work with the big groups of "regular" kids. Fourth graders, man, they don't like to sit still, much less sit still and learn stuff. Not that I don't enjoy it. I help out in the social studies part of the day, and this month they've been working on presidents. You <span style="font-style: italic;">know </span>I've been dropping some presidential trivia knowledge on those kids.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-610378716430901142012-02-05T08:10:00.002-06:002012-02-05T08:20:52.482-06:00How I Met Your Mother TheoryHaving just finished watching HIMYM Season 6 on DVD, I was thinking about it this morning before getting out of bed (where ideas are born and often, quickly forgotten). I arrived at a conclusion: I think The Mother is Barney's sister.<br /><br />We know very little about Barney's sister, and this has to be on purpose by the writers. There are two possible reasons why they haven't introduced her character yet: 1) There's going to be an episode where Barney hits on her in a bar before figuring out she's his sister. (This is the most obvious one.) 2) She's The Mother.<br /><br />Supporting facts: the only thing we've heard about her is that she's "in college." This makes her eligible to have been in the econ class Ted tried to teach, and to be the roommate of the Rachel Bilson grad-student character (both of which are mother-criteria). Also, surely she would be at Barney's wedding, which is where Ted is going to meet her.<br /><br />That's all I've got, but I'm going with it. This is now my officially sponsored theory going forward (or until such time as they introduce Barney's sister and have her meet Ted without them immediately falling in love).Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-88241673697352722502012-01-16T11:09:00.004-06:002012-01-16T11:18:04.121-06:00Good Job, Headline Writers#1:<br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5LFuQ8TlK61KvlWSJbXdraBPWX_z0kcXQ7uZqruOYbMC17TeWxOekt7foywS5Rb46gDQq3rNQwVfVI1LCdsqWNs-awSoJRfHPl7vCNuFHTRElAriFnIVhfCyN0726SWuGl9qB1Wbkqm3n/s1600/rout.PNG"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 63px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5LFuQ8TlK61KvlWSJbXdraBPWX_z0kcXQ7uZqruOYbMC17TeWxOekt7foywS5Rb46gDQq3rNQwVfVI1LCdsqWNs-awSoJRfHPl7vCNuFHTRElAriFnIVhfCyN0726SWuGl9qB1Wbkqm3n/s400/rout.PNG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5698278529307018866" border="0" /></a>Very poetic, ABC News. Maybe invest in a thesaurus, though?<br /><br />#2:<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8qOUFIswtYbQcuyQ6wvWpn6Stp1D-p-Lq83NrEv0FmKQ2vegnSmWJg1_8DVohEKEiSeQ5QxQiXP9AqNeWxqnWaNpoZxVvNXEM5EXAaPBY21uQwZdMuivYDgwqMA0nZB6v5o7avSQ1rDgr/s1600/cruise.PNG"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 165px; height: 173px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8qOUFIswtYbQcuyQ6wvWpn6Stp1D-p-Lq83NrEv0FmKQ2vegnSmWJg1_8DVohEKEiSeQ5QxQiXP9AqNeWxqnWaNpoZxVvNXEM5EXAaPBY21uQwZdMuivYDgwqMA0nZB6v5o7avSQ1rDgr/s400/cruise.PNG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5698278780698336914" border="0" /></a>This has been on the Daily Beast for days. I guess Tebow's been busy! I assume he wasn't rescued, but was the one doing the rescuing.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-11472821834501446632012-01-01T20:32:00.003-06:002012-01-01T20:51:41.054-06:00The ShinglesOne of my personal notable events of 2011 was getting ye olde shingles. By request, here's an account:<br /><br />Day 1: "Ew, what is this rash? It must be from the heat." [Ignores the fact that she never got a rash from heat while living in Texas, carefully cleans and airs out rash with blithe confidence that will do it.]<br /><br />Day 2: "Wait, why is it WORSE?!? I was being so nice to it!!"[Resolves to go to doctor once the weekend is over, mostly enjoys Packers Family Night in spite of being itchy and stingy in the heat and, later, pouring rain]<br /><br /><div style="text-align: center;"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeytba4USs86TjomQqbvdMQ-P5L_N4M2pinQKBp_GkpKwlNapjipgmCsdYG5X4USkxC1uBsqDRq6oJ4S2BoBe2G4l1DA_cknSxttP3NyGt21GAjdjy5xbITCgm3duiZ8SmzeXuPgsuLRcU/s1600/P8060009.JPG"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 300px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeytba4USs86TjomQqbvdMQ-P5L_N4M2pinQKBp_GkpKwlNapjipgmCsdYG5X4USkxC1uBsqDRq6oJ4S2BoBe2G4l1DA_cknSxttP3NyGt21GAjdjy5xbITCgm3duiZ8SmzeXuPgsuLRcU/s400/P8060009.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5692859780039563234" border="0" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center;">The face of a person who is stoked to be at Lambeau Field, but is also secretly pretty uncomfortable. (Me, not Neal.)<br /></div><br />Day 3: "Less worse than yesterday! Hooray?"<br /><br />Day 4: Doctor: "That's shingles." Me: "SHINGLES?!? No, yeah, actually that makes a lot of sense." Doctor: "Take these horse pills."<br /><br />Days 5-<span style="font-style: italic;"></span>8: [Has exact right amount of sick time to sit on the couch, feeling sorry for self and watching Project Runway (season 8)]<br /><br />And then the horse pills worked! The end.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-74602344881100929332011-11-30T21:13:00.001-06:002011-11-30T21:13:06.503-06:00Review: Crossed<br /> <a style='float: left; padding-right: 20px' href='http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9794437'><img alt='Crossed' border='0' src='http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1299873958m/9794437.jpg'/></a><br /> <a href='http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9794437'>Crossed</a> by <a href='http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1304470'>Ally Condie</a><br/><br /> My rating: <a href='http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/222693439'>2 of 5 stars</a><br /> <br/><br/><br /> Well. That wasn't good.<br /><br />The biggest problem with <i>Crossed</i> is that it's extremely dull. The greatest strength of the first book, <i>Matched,</i> was the Society the characters lived in. This book takes the characters out of Society and puts them in a canyon, where they wander back and forth to no clear purpose. <br /><br />If the characters were particularly vibrant or intriguing, this might still work. But as it turns out, when separated from the interesting concepts of their world, the characters are dull and generic. Also, half of the chapters are from the perspective of the female lead, and half from that of the male lead, but the voice they're written in is identical. I could only tell who was narrating from the headers and context clues. Say what you will about Stephenie Meyer (and heaven knows I have), but the chapters written from Jacob's perspective <i>sound</i> like a different person. (Oh, and either I had stopped paying attention, or the little interpersonal dramas made <i>no</i> sense. "You know that story you told about your mother and also it happened in a book or something? Well, I have deduced it was really about YOU!" Seriously, does anybody know what that was about?)<br /><br />I liked the first one, and I still intend to read the third one when it comes out. The optimistic interpretation of how bad this one was is that Condie only had enough material for two books, but decided she needed to stretch the gap between points A and B because her publisher wanted a trilogy. The pessimistic interpretation is that once she ran out of plot to crib from <i>The Giver,</i> she was out of ideas. I'm hoping it's the first option, but we'll find out.<br /> <br/><br/><br /> <a href='http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/222693439'>View all my reviews</a><br /> Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-72523824230006358452011-07-29T22:16:00.004-05:002011-07-29T22:36:43.897-05:00Another Webcomic RecommendationI know I read more webcomics than many people, but seriously, this one's very good: Basic Instructions. It's monochromatically hilarious!<br /><br />I'll only put one sample here, since it turned out small (click on it to embiggen, or see the original page <a href="http://basicinstructions.net/basic-instructions/2010/1/20/how-to-watch-a-movie-you-are-told-you-will-love-rerun.html">here</a>):<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpLo8VELVLeYMUj0rNMv39lEfdPnjgj99BZOy2y-sIA3xq8hdsWqlACiNj_4gHLNzGFq6eWARnsOsuuddq6AF9dMQSXSiQ-CFNgUJCZ-O8QSMI_wARWv8bhQC0xZWsUtdfIimNT8uImyjY/s1600/basic+inst+beauty.gif"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 400px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpLo8VELVLeYMUj0rNMv39lEfdPnjgj99BZOy2y-sIA3xq8hdsWqlACiNj_4gHLNzGFq6eWARnsOsuuddq6AF9dMQSXSiQ-CFNgUJCZ-O8QSMI_wARWv8bhQC0xZWsUtdfIimNT8uImyjY/s400/basic+inst+beauty.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5634979753599049138" border="0" /></a><br />And here are some links to my favorites:<br /><br /><a href="http://basicinstructions.net/basic-instructions/2010/1/17/how-to-tell-someone-that-they-are-wrong.html">How to Tell Someone that They are Wrong</a><br /><br /><a href="http://basicinstructions.net/basic-instructions/2009/11/15/how-to-play-video-games-together.html">How to Play Video Games "Together"</a><br /><br /><a href="http://basicinstructions.net/basic-instructions/2009/11/11/how-to-get-amazing-kicks-from-something-normal-people-will-n.html">How to Get Amazing Kicks from Something "Normal" People Will Never Understand</a> (it's about the show <span style="font-style: italic;">The Prisoner</span>)<br /><br /><a href="http://basicinstructions.net/basic-instructions/2009/10/7/how-to-calm-a-frightened-child-rerun.html">How to Calm a Frightened Child</a><br /><br /><a href="http://basicinstructions.net/basic-instructions/2009/11/18/how-to-create-a-weapon-that-is-devastating-and-unstoppable.html">How to Create a Weapon that is Devastating and Unstoppable</a><br /><br />and, from just a few days ago, <a href="http://basicinstructions.net/basic-instructions/2011/7/24/how-to-live-your-dreams.html">How to Live Your Dreams</a>.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-38025143257347597002011-07-17T00:09:00.006-05:002011-07-17T01:09:10.947-05:00My Favorite Lines from Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2Voldemort: "How do you live with yourself?"<br />Lucious Malfoy: "FAAAABulously!"<br /><br />Neville: "I have snake murder in my heart!"<br /><br />Snape: "Take [my tears]! Take them!"<br />Harry: "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnveAIQ2FpM">PENSIEVES DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!</a>"<span style="display: block;" id="formatbar_Buttons"><span onmouseover="ButtonHoverOn(this);" onmouseout="ButtonHoverOff(this);" onmouseup="" onmousedown="CheckFormatting(event);FormatbarButton('richeditorframe', this, 8);ButtonMouseDown(this);" class=" down" style="display: block;" id="formatbar_CreateLink" title="Link"></span></span><br />Ron: "The Room of Requirement doesn't show up on the map. That's what you said last year, remember?"<br />Hermione: "That's right, I forgot! Thanks for finally putting right our gender roles, so now we can make out!"<br /><br />McGonagall: "Longbottom, you and Mr. Finnigan go blow it up!"<br />Neville: "Blow what up, Professor?"<br />McGonagall: "The Alfonso Cuaron Memorial Bridge, of course!"<br /><br />Every character, ever: "You have your mother's eyes!"<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgK2w8YaENWyMrTgvu3E6XENG3bWqi9JBxq-PVFqDdQ7uP5D1alTFUQh3YS_FczqLtc9289yCwxBGMaPsTj6FtaHA6rStzRuNEkDEm8BzJQaKairBeOIbJHuDyffX2lN5jvY34pJor1AHl0/s1600/daniel-radcliffe.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 252px; height: 300px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgK2w8YaENWyMrTgvu3E6XENG3bWqi9JBxq-PVFqDdQ7uP5D1alTFUQh3YS_FczqLtc9289yCwxBGMaPsTj6FtaHA6rStzRuNEkDEm8BzJQaKairBeOIbJHuDyffX2lN5jvY34pJor1AHl0/s320/daniel-radcliffe.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5630187665023987042" border="0" /></a>Little girl who played young Lily: [has brown eyes]<br /><br />David Yates, to the special effects guys: "I like this scene, but can something be floating in it? Always more floating!"<br /><br />Little Albus: "But Dad, what if the Sorting Hat puts me in Slytherin?"<br />Harry: "Son, with that haircut, I'd be worrying about Hufflepuff."<br /><br />Little Albus: "Why are they all <span style="font-style: italic;">staring</span>?"<br />Ron: "Don't let it worry you. It's me. I'm extremely famous."<br />OH NO WAIT they didn't include the best line from the epilogue<br /><br />and of course,<br />Voldemort: "And I would have gotten away with it too, if not for you meddling kids!" [dissolves into confetti]Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-16456994522720683622011-07-13T12:24:00.002-05:002011-07-13T12:35:04.969-05:00Today in Vanity License Plates<span style="font-weight: bold;">HEY IM JT</span><br /><br />I think we all know exactly how this went down.<br /><br />JT: Hey, yeah, so, can I get a vanity license plate that says "JT"? Because I'm JT.<br /><br />Low-level bureaucrat: JT is taken.<br /><br />JT: Um, ok, how about "IM JT"?<br /><br />LLB: Taken.<br /><br />JT, deep in thought: How can I let people know, with my car, that I'm JT? Hmmm . . . . Hey, I've got it!<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">58 MPG</span><br /><br />The car with this one parks at the bank near my library. I don't know what kind it is, but I guess I'm supposed to be consumed with jealousy every time I see it.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-75487191134341311602011-06-01T18:55:00.006-05:002011-06-01T21:31:03.177-05:00May Classics: Task CompletedI did it! I went the whole month of May only reading classic works of literature! Except for when I brought the <span style="font-style: italic;">Axe Cop </span>book home from the library, but comics don't count, right?<br /><br />As Craig pointed out, <a href="http://rachel-adventures.blogspot.com/2011/05/may-classics.html">my initial list of classics</a> was waaaay too ambitious for one month of reading, so I'm planning to hold more Classics Months in the future. Not this month, though. For one thing, I already told all my cheesy YA lit holds to come back to the library for me. For another thing, one of my co-workers pointed out that it's better to read classics in the wintertime. That's clearly just true.<br /><br />Here's what I accomplished:<br /><br />1. <span style="font-style: italic;">Ivanhoe</span><br /><br />Here's my <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/164781461">Goodreads review</a>. In a nutshell, <span style="font-style: italic;">Ivanhoe </span>is not really good, but I can see how it set up a lot of the knights/chivalry/Richard the Lionhearted/Robin Hood cliches we all love so much. So it has that going for it.<br /><br />After I read <span style="font-style: italic;">Ivanhoe</span>, I checked out the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044760/">1952 movie version</a> and boy howdy! If I thought the book had some dumb parts, it has nothing on the film. Neal and I had a grand old MST3K time with that one. Short version: plastic swords and helmets, everyone except Elizabeth Taylor is ugly and can't act (and Elizabeth Taylor's acting was no great shakes either), and the comic relief characters dies a painful death that no one ever remarks upon. Oh, and it got nominated for Best Picture that year, so I hope you're ashamed of yourself, cinema industry of 1952.<br /><br />2. <span style="font-style: italic;">Slaughterhouse-Five</span><br /><br />I would link you to my Goodreads review for this one, but I was only in the mood to write "It would have been better without the aliens." Which is true.<br /><br />It's an odd little book; one that's better before the story gets started. It starts with what I assume is an only barely fictionalized account of Vonnegut trying to, but having a hard time getting around to, writing a book about his experience in Dresden during WWII. Once it gets to its protagonist, Billy Pilgrim, it's not nearly as interesting. Here's my problem with the book: Billy Pilgrim is a worthless, pathetic nothing even before he goes to war. His experience in Dresden doesn't break him. He's pretty much exactly the same until he goes crazy, long after the war, because he's in a plane crash and sustains a serious head injury. I don't care about Billy Pilgrim when he's being useless in Germany; I don't care about Billy Pilgrim when he's experiencing middle-aged ennui; I don't care about Billy Pilgrim when he thinks he's been abducted by aliens and living in their zoo. I would care about what happened in Dresden, but that only gets a cameo.<br /><br />3. <span style="font-style: italic;">Great Expectations</span><br /><br />My <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/164780675">Goodreads review</a> for this one is pretty long. This was the biggest surprise of Classics Month: I liked <span style="font-style: italic;">Great Expectations</span>! It was sort of difficult going for the first two-thirds (although it was much funnier than I expected), but then the last third was really great and made the first parts worth it. I really enjoyed it.<br /><br />4. <span style="font-style: italic;">The Catcher in the Rye</span><br /><br />Like I mention in the <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/164780906">Goodreads review</a>, this is the only one of the books I read in May that I don't understand why it's a classic. Holden Caulfield is much, much more worthless than Billy Pilgrim. A co-worker/Goodreads friend told me she was sad to see I hated the book. I asked her if the point was to hate Holden, and she said it was, so I will admit that at least it's successful. I will give it this, too: it's a very believable internal portrait of an anti-social, spoiled, stuck-up teenage boy. But that doesn't make it any less irritating to have to spend so much time in his head. Especially when there's no plot to move things along.<br /><br />This is a serious question for you: why do we, as a society, care about this book?<br /><br />5. <span style="font-style: italic;">Heart of Darkness</span><br /><br />I'm not going to lie to you:<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnP9TF4CAQatxQLbMu-x5RnJqou5TPQkFWhQ2QTMtcDghQpyxKjtuOdk7tiTEBkEocDz3k46nH6LyEtjatvyVcmul_AvbLd7TPsWgWdpbRoeIX9RYhv5qaSbcjMM9aoftxlb0yXzHY0h_7/s1600/heartofdarkness.JPG"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnP9TF4CAQatxQLbMu-x5RnJqou5TPQkFWhQ2QTMtcDghQpyxKjtuOdk7tiTEBkEocDz3k46nH6LyEtjatvyVcmul_AvbLd7TPsWgWdpbRoeIX9RYhv5qaSbcjMM9aoftxlb0yXzHY0h_7/s320/heartofdarkness.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5613415281380950946" border="0" /></a>I picked <span style="font-style: italic;">Heart of Darkness </span>because I didn't finish <span style="font-style: italic;"></span><span style="font-style: italic;">Catcher in the Rye </span>until the 29th. No regrets!<br /><br />Again: <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/164781163">Goodreads review</a> link. Basically, I can tell this is good (unlike with some extremely popular J. D. Salinger books I could name), but I don't think I could fully <span style="font-style: italic;">get </span>it without more outside study. It hints instead of explaining. I wish I had read it in some level of school so I could have wrung more of the meaning out of it.<br /><br />That was the great thing about the <a href="http://axecop.com/">Axe Cop</a> book. All the commentary!Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-19630322393555529022011-05-09T20:28:00.002-05:002011-05-09T20:37:39.888-05:00Et tu, Turge?Welp, <a href="http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/story/15047629/texas-ams-turgeon-agrees-to-take-maryland-position">looks like</a> Maryland has hired away Mark Turgeon from Texas A&M. My reaction? I, um . . . I don't care.<br /><br />I <span style="font-style: italic;">should </span>care, and in some ways I do. It's problematic, but unsurprising, that A&M is a stepping-stone job. And I don't like that part of the reason Turgeon is leaving, probably, is that Aggie fans do not fill Reed on a regular basis. That's stupid. There's no excuse for poor attendance when the team has been consistently good. And, of course, I worry about who Bill Byrne will get as a replacement, especially since it's a little late in the off-season to be finding somebody.<br /><br />However.<br /><br />Mark Turgeon seems like a real nice guy, and he's a good coach, but he's not a great coach. This year's Aggie team, in particular, was just <span style="font-style: italic;">awful </span>to watch. I'm glad they made the tournament, but watching them play was like getting teeth pulled. <br /><br />Now, this is partly coming from me just not following Aggie basketball as closely as I used to. I'm sure I would have liked Turgeon's teams better if I'd known them better. Certainly, A&M could do worse than Turgeon. <span style="font-style: italic;">Certainly</span>. But I feel that he continued Billy Gillispie's success instead of truly building on it. So I think, and I very much hope, that A&M can find somebody who can do at least a <span style="font-style: italic;">little </span>more than that. We'll just have to see.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-19180789710559410792011-05-01T09:40:00.002-05:002011-05-01T10:12:00.340-05:00May ClassicsOK, new project! <br /><br />Last night, it occurred to me: some month, I should only read classic works of literature. (I feel like I have a lot of those to catch up on; due to my lackluster high school English classes [I'm sorry, Mrs. Seuser, it was the textbooks, not you] I've missed out on reading many of the books "everybody" "should" read. I mean, I usually know enough about them to answer a related Trivial Pursuit question, but that's not the same.) And I realized, hey! Tomorrow is the start of a new month! Let's do this thing.<br /><br />This decision has required commitment on my part, I just want you to know. I'm taking back to the library not one, not two, but <span style="font-style: italic;">three </span>fairly awesome-sounding YA lit books, unread. (I've got to write a post about my newfound fascination with YA lit sometime. There's some good stuff for teens out there!) I'm also returning a couple edifying nonfiction works which, um, I'm sure would have been just as good. But now I've got those back on hold (but suspended, so they won't come back to me until June) so I can clear out my book space and head space for Classics of Literature.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"></span>The first (and, give that it is only one month and all, perhaps only) order of business is to read classics Neal and I have on our own shelves, but that I have never read. I'm most determined to read <span style="font-style: italic;">Great Expectations</span>. I bought myself a copy of <span style="font-style: italic;">Great Expectations </span>in maybe middle school, intending to Dickens it up, but I was never able to get through it, no matter how many times I tried. Here's the kicker: I found out, as I was writing this post right here, that I own an <span style="font-style: italic;">abridged </span>version of <span style="font-style: italic;">Great Expectations. </span>I didn't even make it through something two steps up from a Cliff's Notes! So in this case, I won't be reading what we have on our shelf, but rather a different copy of something we have on our shelf.<br /><br />I think I'll start with <span style="font-style: italic;">Ivanhoe, </span>another book I've tried and failed at in the past. At least my copy of that is unabridged. Other project books include:<br /><br />Machiavelli's <span style="font-style: italic;">The Prince</span> (which I should have read before I wrote my masters thesis, since it came up)<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Gulliver's Travels</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The Catcher in the Rye </span>(although I'm not expecting it to be good, considering all the parodies of Salinger's writing style I've seen)<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Nineteen Eighty-Four</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Fahrenheit 451</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">The Inferno</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Heart of Darkness</span><br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Slaughterhouse-Five</span><br /><br />If I get through those, is there anything else I should target? Any "classics" that I really do need to read? (I also already had <span style="font-style: italic;">Dracula </span>and <span style="font-style: italic;">The Jungle </span>on my Goodreads to-read shelf, so I threw them on my classics-project shelf as well.) I want to do this thing up right!Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-29183857103339064062011-04-26T16:40:00.002-05:002011-04-26T17:25:03.108-05:00Friends: Season Ten<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-XPys-AE43aNEkRG1IOUi1VsQ8ucWSAI3Q59bdD_2nBJdhVlofvzfLFDUTrYfQaplUhWM7uACAwmk8wJxxDsdl__nBDOlzwXZvh6At86qyy0q5lMqH0o93P4NXBQAST0zxT7Fb8Ep51UT/s1600/friends10.jpg"><img style="float: left; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 266px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-XPys-AE43aNEkRG1IOUi1VsQ8ucWSAI3Q59bdD_2nBJdhVlofvzfLFDUTrYfQaplUhWM7uACAwmk8wJxxDsdl__nBDOlzwXZvh6At86qyy0q5lMqH0o93P4NXBQAST0zxT7Fb8Ep51UT/s400/friends10.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5596797093977011858" border="0" /></a><span style="font-weight: bold;">In general:</span><br />Sigh.<br /><br />So here's what happened: I put off and put off watching this season. Then, when I finally got around to the first disc, I discovered that there was a lot in the episodes that made me laugh--it was much better than I remembered. Then, for no good reason, I didn't get around to watching the second disc.<br /><br />I waited so long that once I finally decided to do the dang thing already, I reviewed my notes and discovered I no longer remembered what they meant. So I started from the beginning of the season again. I laughed much less.<br /><br />I tell you this seemingly pointless story because I realized: my viewing experience mirrored the original experience of watching Season Ten back when it first aired. We were so happy to still be getting new episodes of <span style="font-style: italic;">Friends </span>that, if for novelty reasons alone, we enjoyed them pretty well. But we enjoyed them less the more we saw them. (No doubt because of how much the cast was getting paid, this season is only 75% as long as all the others. That made for a lot--<span style="font-style: italic;">a lot</span>--of reruns.) And as the season wore on, even the new episodes seemed less and less good. Because they were indeed less and less good.<br /><br />It cannot be denied, there are funny lines and funny ideas in Season Ten--but not enough of them to fill up even seventeen episodes there are. So the rest of the time is taken up by:<br /><br />-Stretching the good ideas as far as they will go (example: the "floating heads" gag when Monica and Chandler lock everybody out in "The One with the Late Thanksgiving" is funny, until it drags on and on and on)<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-iQ0aHqYqTjAioO56Mnj2zNuVgtKnww9P0FMUTmtT8zEwwhejOocmM8j60-Rui4Hafm8h87-hzm3ZTp5jNfyLUNOcGx_gXAo-U83t4jjqXZQ3pLWCaZe-a_OTSRUmxi7EbC5R2lZ02NLp/s1600/friends10floating.jpg"><img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 300px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-iQ0aHqYqTjAioO56Mnj2zNuVgtKnww9P0FMUTmtT8zEwwhejOocmM8j60-Rui4Hafm8h87-hzm3ZTp5jNfyLUNOcGx_gXAo-U83t4jjqXZQ3pLWCaZe-a_OTSRUmxi7EbC5R2lZ02NLp/s400/friends10floating.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5596795662513346882" border="0" /></a><br />-Having the characters be horrible, horrible human beings (one example from among so many: pretty much everyone in "The One with Phoebe's Wedding." Chandler and Ross both throw fits about not being in the wedding, while Monica runs the wedding by being a cruel as possible. The worst thing about this is that after firing Monica, Phoebe gets overwhelmed by the logistics and re-hires her, making the lesson that Monica was right to be horrible all along. Yay?)<br /><br />-Making Joey ridiculously, cartoonishly, painfully stupid (example: in "The One Where Joey Speaks French," where Phoebe tries to teach Joey French for a role, and the culmination of the plot is that Phoebe tells the casting director that Joey is retarded. It's in French, but the word "retarded" is <span style="font-style: italic;">actually used</span> in the subtitles. Why does <span style="font-style: italic;">calling Joey retarded</span> make Phoebe a good friend?!?)<br /><br />And I have to tell you, I couldn't even watch the Danny DeVito scenes in "The One Where the Stripper Cries." I had to fast-forward. My heart couldn't take it.<br /><br />But then the series ends as it must: Monica and Chandler move out of The Apartment, having achieved babies; Phoebe has been married off; and of course Ross and Rachel end up together. (Which is why the Joey-Rachel romance had to be quickly and illogically killed off at the beginning of the season.) It wasn't creative, but it was compulsory. The loose ends had to be wrapped up, except in the event of spin-off potential.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Little things that drive me crazy:</span><br />Rachel's bangs in the second half of the season. They're always in her face. Get a barrette, girl, dang!<br /><br />When Monica gets shell-ended dreadlocks in her hair and then rubs them "sexily" on Chandler. It bums me out.<br /><br />Pretty much every element of "The One Where Estelle Dies." Phoebe (and everyone who doesn't stop her) thinks it's appropriate to hide Joey's agent's death from him because . . . ? Chandler keeps Janice from buying the house next door to theirs by pretending he still wants her, in (as <a href="http://rachel-adventures.blogspot.com/2009/11/friends-season-six.html">I have complained before</a>) a blatant re-hash of the Janice episode in Season Seven. Jane Lynch guest stars and is utterly wasted in a nothing role. Rachel decides to move to Paris even though her baby lives in New York (the plan seems to be that <span style="font-style: italic;">the baby</span> will take a bunch of transatlantic flights). Rachel's old boss from Ralph Lauren agrees to re-hire her in response to Ross's bribes, so . . . that guy's pretty corrupt. In a classic Ross Misunderstanding, Ross offers to do a favor for Rachel's boss's son . . . but makes it sound like he's going to <span style="font-style: italic;">molest </span>Rachel's boss's son! Ha ha! Pedophile jokes are awesome. And finally,<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyb-lR1BkZ9kKrx_UFwU58ZPukNyzDpjtkxtZkQeiAMrow16Krudy6-hFzd5phr8pOA-BRTw-hhx4H5thyphenhyphenjEVQrYAHw2xXaOipBCB1OBDlu8FmQRU_6VAAP_j470Qt3S_WYXhxlNaKm3So/s1600/friends10sweater.jpg"><img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 300px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyb-lR1BkZ9kKrx_UFwU58ZPukNyzDpjtkxtZkQeiAMrow16Krudy6-hFzd5phr8pOA-BRTw-hhx4H5thyphenhyphenjEVQrYAHw2xXaOipBCB1OBDlu8FmQRU_6VAAP_j470Qt3S_WYXhxlNaKm3So/s400/friends10sweater.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5596794998089008482" border="0" /></a><br />what is Rachel wearing here? Grandma's S&M sweater?<br /><br />I'll stop with this section now, because there several more episodes I could do a similar list with. ("The One with Ross's Grant," "The One with the Home Study," "The One with the Late Thanksgiving," "The One with the Birth Mother," and "The One Where Joey Speaks French" spring to mind.) But that wouldn't be good for the mental health of any of us, I'm sure.<br /><br />No, one last thing: in the very last scene, everyone is together and gives up their keys to the apartment and so forth. Monica and Chandler are happy, because now they have their babies. Ross and Rachel are happy, because they're together and . . . wait, where's Emma? To be fair, you could ask this question a couple times in pretty much every episode, but <span style="font-style: italic;">seriously</span>, why isn't Emma there? The other babies are there! Why not Emma?! (I also think Mike should have been there, since he represents Phoebe's happy ending, but I can understand why his presence--unlike Emma's!--would have been intrusive.)<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Plain old little things:</span><br />Anne Dudek plays Precious, the girlfriend Mike decides to break up with on her birthday. Years later, Anne Dudek appeared on <span style="font-style: italic;">How I Met Your Mother </span>as Natalie, a girl Ted breaks up with on her birthday (twice). What are the odds?<br /><br />Joey sold his boat (<span style="font-style: italic;">The Mr. Bowmont, </span>as I hope he still called it) two years ago. But when exactly did the chick and the duck die?<br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />Little things I love:</span><br />Chandler's certainty that their baby's biological father is not the one that was captain of the football team, but the one that murdered his father with a shovel. (Of course Monica's not as worried, "He's probably got a tattoo that says 'Mom' on his shovel-wielding arm!")<br /><br />Crap Bag<br /><br />Rachel doesn't mind when drunk Ross spills the beans that Charlie has never liked Rachel: "It's OK, girls tend not to like me." At least she's at peace with it.<br /><br />Phoebe's right: Jack Bing is a great name, very worthy of a 1940s newspaperman.<br /><br />At the beginning of "The One Where Chandler Gets Caught," everybody is sitting around the coffee house, talking about which they'd rather give up for life, sex or food. It's very first season, and it's cute they included a scene like that in the last season.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Lines:</span></span><br /><ul><li>Monica, with crazy hair: "Wait a minute--Ross and Charlie, Joey and Rachel, Phoebe and Mike--we're the only people leaving with the same person we came with!" Chandler: "That's not true, I came with Monica, and I'm leaving with Weird Al!"</li><li>Chandler, after Joey discovers the thesaurus: "You signed it Baby Kangaroo Tribbiani."</li><li>Rachel: "He's cute! Thank you, JewHunks.com!"<br /></li><li>Phoebe, when Knicks fans heckle her and Mike: "ODIN WILL SMITE YOU!"</li><li>Monica: "Chandler, you're panicking!" Chandler: "Uh-huh! Join me, won't you?!?"<br /></li></ul><span style="font-weight: bold;">Let's talk about Gunther:<br /></span>Gunther is pathetic. Gunther is passive and passive-aggressive. Gunther is awkward and a little creepy and off-putting to the people around him. Gunther is complicit in his own misery.<br /><br />But how can you not love Gunther?<br /><br />Gunther speaks Dutch! Gunther is steadfast! When Gunther gets invited to a party, he helps do the dishes.<br /><br />Considering that James Michael Tyler appeared in more episodes by far than anyone outside the six core actors (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0108778/fullcredits#cast">he's got 141</a> to runner-up Elliot Gould's 20), it's surprising that there are no Gunther-centric episodes. The closest thing to it is "The One with the Joke" from Season 6, in which Joey starts working at Central Perk, resulting in upwards of three Gunther scenes. Even there, he's still a supporting player in the C plot.<br /><br />But let it not be said that Gunther is unimportant! His effect on events may be subtle, as in "The One with a Chick and a Duck" (Season 3). The episode begins with Gunther coming outside to bring Rachel a cocoa which--because it distracts her from Monica roller-skating towards her--results in Rachel breaking a rib. Gunther can also be direct. One of my favorite Gunther moments is in "The One Where Monica and Richards are Friends" (Season 3), where Gunther is the only person willing to tell Phoebe's boyfriend that his junk is hanging out ("Hey buddy, this is a family place. Put the mouse back in the house"). And occasionally, Gunther really shakes things up. These are the the top three most pivotal Gunther moments:<br /><br />#3: Gunther helps convince Joey to move back in with Chandler, "The One Where Eddie Won't Go"<br />After getting killed off on <span style="font-style: italic;">Days of Our Lives, </span>Joey blithely assumes his next big success is right around the corner. He wants to keep not just his fancy apartment, but all the fancy junk he bought to decorate the apartment. Ross tries to convince him to cut back on his expenses, but he resists. Then he goes to Central Perk and shares his woes with Gunther, who asks how they killed his character. "I was buried in an avalanche," Gunther then volunteers. "I was Bryce on <span style="font-style: italic;">All My Children.</span>" This more than anything else gets the point across to Joey that the next big paycheck might be a long way off. For that reason (and to help Chandler with his insane-replacement-roommate problem), Joey ends up back where he belongs.<br /><br />#2: Gunther unwittingly gets Rachel to quit her job at Central Perk, "The One Where Rachel Quits"<br />Gunther tells Rachel that their boss, Terry, wants Rachel to go through new waitress training again (because she's a terrible, terrible waitress). Gunther's patient but condescending explanations of where the trays go and how to tell decaf from regular coffee drive Rachel over the edge. She quits the coffee shop to take a gamble on a career in fashion, changing the entire trajectory of her character.<br /><br />#1: Gunther breaks up Ross and Rachel, "The One the Morning After"<br />Yes, that's right! It was Gunther! Recall: after getting back together with Rachel, Ross scrambles frantically to keep her from finding out that he slept with the girl from the copy place. Chloe the copy girl has already told her co-worker, who has told his sister Jasmine, who works at the massage parlor with Phoebe. Jasmine promises not to tell Phoebe, but has already told her roommate--cut to Gunther. Ross pleads, "Please tell me you didn't say anything to Rachel about me and the girl from the copy place." Gunther, with faux concern: "Oh, I'm sorry. Was I not supposed to?" If Rachel hadn't found out, or if Ross had had enough time to tell her himself, their relationship may have been salvageable. Gunther: evil genius?<br /><br />Well, no. The best summary of Gunther, when you get right down to it, is his costume in "The One with the Halloween Party": Charlie Brown.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Top two episodes:</span><br />"The One with the Cake"<br />or: "The One with Joey's Dramatic Reading"<br /><br />"The Last One"<br /><br />. . . I mean, neither of those are really that good, but they're the best of the 17.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">But fear not!</span><br />This is not the note on which we are ending the series of <span style="font-style: italic;">Friends </span>posts. There is still a wrap-up post to go, featuring (among other things; let me know if you have suggestions) all-time best and worst episodes, all-time best and worst guest stars, the seasons ranked in order, and some stuff about kissing! It's gonna be good times.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-58522110453429188432011-01-06T15:22:00.008-06:002011-01-08T11:34:53.186-06:00Twilight: A Primer<span style="font-weight: bold;">Twilight </span>is the first book in a series about teenagers, vampires, and teenage vampires. It is one of the most popular books of the current millennium and is written at roughly the level of a poorly-edited <span style="font-style: italic;">Sweet Valley High </span>volume. Its author, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Stephenie Meyer, </span>seems likely to have produced it in one draft.<br /><br />The book's protagonist and narrator, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Bella, </span>is a perpetually whiny teenage girl who hates herself, her parents, and her friends. Readers are expected to identify with her on every level.<br /><br />Bella's love interest is the vampire <span style="font-weight: bold;">Edward</span>; he is humorless, controlling, manipulative, condescending, over-protective, materialistic, pessimistic, and snide. Readers are expected to realize that he is <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Perfect Man</span>.<br /><br />Edward belongs to a "family" of vampires, two of whom pose as adults and four others that, like Edward, pretend to be teenagers. (Apparently, vampires in <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight </span>think it is a good use of their immortality to attend high school over and over.) Edward's father, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Carlisle, </span>is a doctor; his wife is <span style="font-weight: bold;">Esme.</span> Edward's sister <span style="font-weight: bold;">Rosalie </span>is remarkable for being very attractive even though all vampires are very attractive, while her husband-brother <span style="font-weight: bold;">Emmett </span>is remarkable for being very strong even though all vampires are very strong. Brother <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jasper</span> can <span style="font-weight: bold;">influence other people's emotions</span>, which Stephenie Meyer forgets during and after the second book in the series. He is paired off with <span style="font-weight: bold;">Alice. </span>She can <span style="font-weight: bold;">see the future</span>, with the accuracy of her visions varying by current plot convenience. Edward also has a special ability in that he can read minds, except for Bella's. This causes Edward to think Bella is unpredictable, even though she is not.<br /><br />The book begins when Bella moves to <span style="font-weight: bold;">Forks, Washington, </span>a place that she <span style="font-weight: bold;">hates</span>. Forks is rainy and cloudy, and Bella hates rain and clouds. Approximately <span style="font-weight: bold;">30% </span>of <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight</span> is Bella complaining about the <span style="font-weight: bold;">weather.</span> Bella moves in with her father, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Charlie, </span>whom she refers to by his first name because she does not respect him. (Bella used to live with her mother, <span style="font-weight: bold;">Renee, </span>whom she thinks is <span style="font-weight: bold;">stupid</span>.) Charlie's character traits are not saying much and watching sports. (He is also the local police chief, which does not matter to the story.)<br /><br />Bella <span style="font-weight: bold;">whines </span>before her first day of school how none of the other kids will like her. On her first day of school, all the other kids <span style="font-weight: bold;">love her for reasons that are never explained.</span> Bella whines about this, and treats everyone who tries to talk to her with <span style="font-weight: bold;">scorn.</span> The one exception to the rule that everyone loves Bella is Edward Cullen, who looks at her like he hates her and then does not come back to school for a week. Bella is sad and whines about this, because she misses the one person in the entire school who was rude to her. When Edward returns, he is inexplicably nice to her, which she whines about.<br /><br />One day, Bella is almost <span style="font-weight: bold;">killed by a van, </span>but Edward demonstrates inhuman speed and strength to save her life. Since she was nearly killed by a van, she is put into a neck brace and taken to the hospital. Her primary concerns at this time are, in order of her priorities: 1) her embarrassment about being seen in a neck brace 2) her jealousy that Edward is not put in a neck brace 3) her annoyance that the boy who was driving the van keeps apologizing to her and 4) trying to figure out how Edward has inhuman speed and strength. Edward <span style="font-weight: bold;">refuses to tell her </span>how he has inhuman speed and strength.<br /><br />After two chapters of <span style="font-weight: bold;">nothing happening, </span>Bella takes a trip to the beach with the friends she does not like. There she meets <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jacob Black, </span>a boy about her own age who is actually pleasant. The existence of Jacob proves that Stephenie Meyer can in fact write a character who is likable, but raises the question of why she so rarely exercises that ability. After Jacob hints that he knows something about the Cullen family, Bella <span style="font-weight: bold;">strategically manipulates him </span>to get him to tell her what it is. Jacob then tells of her of his tribe's legends about <span style="font-weight: bold;">as-yet-unnamed, blood-drinking, supernatural creatures, </span>which the Cullens are the said to be. Later, Bella uses "her favorite search engine" to Google <span style="font-weight: bold;">vampires.</span><br /><br />Bella takes a trip with girls she does not like but calls her friends anyway to a nearby town to shop. Bella eventually goes somewhere on her own and, because she is a <span style="font-weight: bold;">girl, </span>and therefore has <span style="font-weight: bold;">no sense of direction, </span>she gets lost. She is set upon by some <span style="font-weight: bold;">rapists or something, </span>but just in the nick of time, Edward <span style="font-weight: bold;">saves her. </span>It turns out that he knew where she was because he had been <span style="font-weight: bold;">stalking her. </span>Bella is <span style="font-weight: bold;">fine with that</span>. By the end of the evening, Bella and Edward have discussed how Edward is a mind-reading vampire who instinctively wants to kill Bella and drain her blood. Bella is <span style="font-weight: bold;">fine with that.</span> Also, Edward and Bella are now <span style="font-weight: bold;">in love for some reason.</span><br /><br />Now that they are in <span style="font-weight: bold;">true love, </span>Edward takes Bella to a <span style="font-weight: bold;">beautiful meadow, </span>where Bella tells us again, some more, about how <span style="font-weight: bold;">beautiful Edward is. </span>They <span style="font-weight: bold;">talk and talk </span>about their love and <span style="font-weight: bold;">stare </span>at each other. This is also when we find out that when <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight </span>vampires are exposed to sunlight, it does not hurt them. They merely <span style="font-weight: bold;">sparkle as if covered with diamonds. True story.</span><br /><br />Edward rips up some trees and runs around to demonstrate how <span style="font-weight: bold;">dangerous </span>he is. He tells Bella how much he loves the way she <span style="font-weight: bold;">smells </span>and how he is downright <span style="font-weight: bold;">addicted to her stank. </span>He tells her <span style="font-weight: bold;">she's an idiot </span>for wanting to be with him. ("You're an idiot" is a real quote. Page 274.) Bella describes how Edward <span style="font-weight: bold;">sparkles </span>and how kissing him is like kissing a <span style="font-weight: bold;">cold, hard statue. </span>This is all meant to be <span style="font-weight: bold;">sexy.</span><br /><br />It turns out that Edward has been <span style="font-weight: bold;">breaking into </span>Bella's <span style="font-weight: bold;">bedroom </span>for <span style="font-weight: bold;">months </span>in order to <span style="font-weight: bold;">watch her sleep. </span>Bella is only upset about this because she thinks she may have said something <span style="font-weight: bold;">embarrassing</span> while sleeping. Once she finds out, Bella lets Edward stay over every single night. This is not hard to hide from Charlie because Edward and Bella are <span style="font-weight: bold;">much cleverer than him.</span><br /><br />Bella meets Edward's family. Because they are <span style="font-weight: bold;">better than normal people, </span>the Cullens are <span style="font-weight: bold;">very rich.</span> Edward's parents are stoked to meet Bella, because <span style="font-weight: bold;">no one can be happy </span><span>until and unless they are paired off with a </span><span style="font-weight: bold;">person of the opposite sex.</span> After we learn about how Carlisle became a vampire and that Edward has many CDs, it is time for <span style="font-weight: bold;">Vampire Baseball.</span><br /><br />Vampire Baseball can only be played during thunderstorms because the sound of a super-strong vampire hitting a ball with a bat is <span style="font-weight: bold;">so loud. </span>Vampires pitch and hit the ball <span style="font-weight: bold;">so hard </span>that Bella can't even see it, but even though the ball travels <span style="font-weight: bold;">so far </span>after being hit, there aren't many home runs because vampire outfielders are <span style="font-weight: bold;">so fast. </span>Vampire Baseball is <span style="font-weight: bold;">so stupid.</span><br /><br />After Vampire Baseball, on page 372, the <span style="font-weight: bold;">plot </span>finally shows up. Some evil vampires show up, and one of them decides he wants to <span style="font-weight: bold;">kill Bella for some reason</span>. It is decided that Bella should leave town, but first she needs to "pretend" to be incredibly cruel to Charlie so she doesn't have to tell him the real reason she's leaving. She then goes with Alice and Jasper to Phoenix.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight </span>somehow becomes more boring at this point, with pages and pages describing Bella hanging out in a hotel room being bored and sad. (She is not sad because someone is trying to kill her, but because Edward isn't there.) The evil vampire lures Bella away from her protectors by telling her he has her mother and must come alone to a <span style="font-weight: bold;">ballet studio</span>. Once Bella gets there, the evil vampire reveals that he does not have her mother. He also reveals his entire backstory, thought process, and evil plan in an <span style="font-weight: bold;">endless monologue. </span>A climactic fight finally occurs when Edward et al. track them to the ballet studio, but we the readers do not get to see it because Bella has been <span style="font-weight: bold;">knocked unconscious</span>.<br /><br />Bella wakes up in a hospital. Her family has been told that she's injured not because of Vampire Violence, but because--wait for it!--she <span style="font-style: italic;">fell down the stairs.</span> Imaginative! (People believe this because Bella is <span style="font-weight: bold;">very clumsy.</span> I know I haven't mentioned that yet but don't worry; if you read the book Stephenie Meyer will remind you of it on every other page.)<br /><br />In the end, Bella goes back to Forks, and Edward tricks her into going to <span style="font-weight: bold;">prom. </span>As she does with parties, presents, all forms of attention, and joy, Bella hates prom. Bella tells Edward she wants to become a vampire, and as Edward does with all of Bella's hope and initiates, he says no. After almost <span style="font-weight: bold;">500 pages</span>, the book mercifully ends.<br /><br />The bad news is that there are <span style="font-weight: bold;">three more to go.</span><br /><br />For more information on<span style="font-style: italic;"> Twilight, </span>please consult these sources:<br /><a href="http://reasoningwithvampires.tumblr.com/">Reasoning with Vampires</a>: Dana is grammatically editing the <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight </span>books with grim determination, just like someone should have before allowing them to be published.<br /><br /><a href="http://markreads.net/reviews/2010/11/complete-mark-reads-twilight-archive/">Mark Reads</a>: Mark provides a chapter-by-chapter breakdown of the heartbreaking insanity that is the <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight </span>saga. I irrevocably and unconditionally love Mark.<br /><br /><a href="http://stoney321.livejournal.com/317176.html">LDS Sparkledammerung!</a>: This is a very hilarious <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight </span>summary/explanation of <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight</span>'s semi-hidden Mormon propaganda. Helpful Bjork-as-Alice jpegs!<br /><br /><a href="http://cleolinda.livejournal.com/602881.html">Cleolinda's Thoughts On Twilight</a>: Cleolinda is of the "<span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight </span>is stupid but I still loved it!" school of thought which I respect if disagree with.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.cracked.com/funny-36-twilight/">The Cracked Guide to Twilight</a>: A good primer for all four books.<br /><br />Finally, there's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/nerimon#g/c/7CCC01B887254707">Alex Reads Twilight</a>. Have you ever wanted to hear a cheeky English boy tell you all about Twilight as he reads it? Of course you have.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-89173319403652135492011-01-05T21:52:00.000-06:002011-01-05T21:53:08.605-06:00Harry Potter Thoughts: Order of the PhoenixI maintain that <span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Goblet of Fire </span></span>is my favorite of the Harry Potter books, but <span style="font-style: italic;">Order of the Phoenix </span>is also way up there. Yes, it's angsty, but it's also very, very funny. It's our introduction to Luna Lovegood, so how could it not be?<br /><br />I love Luna.<br /><br />Thoughts:<br />1) Speaking of Luna, I think the choice of Evanna Lynch is probably the second-best casting decision in the entire Harry Potter film series. The casting overall is very good--how lucky were they that Daniel Radcliffe turned out to be so talented?--so that's high praise. I say it's second because Robbie Coltrane is so perfect as Hagrid. I have my own mental version of most of the characters when I read the books, but book Hagrid and movie Hagrid are identical to me.<br /><br />2) I love how Harry's escape from Privet Drive in this book is mirrored in the final book. The key to it is how everybody mocks Moody this time for being overcautious and acting like somebody might die, whereas in the last book, well, you know.<br /><br />3) It must be said--all of Dumbledore's decisions vis a vis prefects are stupid. Except for making Hermione one. Why would he make power-mad weasel Draco Malfoy a prefect? Why would he do that? Why would he make Ron a prefect? Ron shows us over and over again that he's not willing to stand up to his house's biggest troublemakers, his brothers, and why would Dumbledore expect him to? I have a higher opinion of Ron's testicular fortitude than most, but I still think making him a prefect was dumb. Most of all, why would Dumbledore wish he could have made Harry a prefect? <span style="font-style: italic;">And would Harry expect to become one?</span> He breaks rules all the time! And not just to fight Dumbledore or whatever--he breaks rules to chill out in Hogsmeade or hang out at Hagrid's hut all the time. There's no higher purpose there; it's just for fun. Seriously, why didn't Dumbledore chose Dean? Dean was clearly the way to go there.<br /><br />I can't argue with the choice of Hermione, though. I guess that was an OK decision.<br /><br />4) I don't particularly care for Ginny (J.K. quite often fell into the trap of "telling" instead of "showing" us why Ginny's supposed to be great), but I give her this: she's good to Neville.<br /><br />5) Everyone but Harry and Ron are right: Hagrid is an awful teacher. Just execrable. Why did Dumbledore hire him for that?<br /><br />I like Professor Grubbly-Plank. Also, she and Professor Sprout would probably make a pretty cute couple. I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'.<br /><br />6) The part where Harry has a conversation with Ron and Hermione about just having kissed Cho is pretty much my favorite scene in the entire series. Again: this book is <span style="font-style: italic;">funny.</span> ("Just because you've got the emotional range of a teaspoon doesn't mean we all have," has, at multiple times in the past, caused me to laugh and laugh and laugh.)<br /><br />7) OK, fellow Potter Hindsight Detectives, take-a look-a this passage from page 470 (just after Harry tells Dumbledore that he's had a vision of a giant snake attacking Mr. Weasley): "Dumbledore now swooped down upon one of the fragile silver instruments whose function Harry had never known, carried it over to his desk, sat down facing [Harry and Professor McGonagall] again, and tapped it gently with the tip of his wand.<br />"The instrument tinkled into life at once with rhythmic clinking noises. Tiny puffs of pale green smoke issued from the minuscule silver tube at the top. Dumbledore watched the smoke closely, his brow furrowed, and after a few seconds, the tiny puffs became a steady stream of smoke that thickened and coiled in the air. . . . A serpent's head grew out of the end of it, opening its mouth wide. . . .<br />" 'Naturally, naturally,' murmured Dumbledore apparently to himself, still observing the stream of smoke without the slightest sign of surprise. 'But in essence divided?'<br />"Harry could make neither head nor tail of this question. The smoke serpent, however, split itself instantly into two snakes, both coiling and undulating in the dark air. With a look of grim satisfaction Dumbledore gave the instrument another gentle tap with his wand: The clinking noise slowed and died, and the smoke serpents grew faint, became a formless haze, and vanished."<br /><br />So . . . what was that thing? Do we ever find out? Does it tell use anything we didn't already know by this point in the narrative (that Harry's seeing into Voldemort's mind, duh)? What's "in essence divided?" Is that a Horcrux hint? Why does Dumbledore need a snake-vision-confirmation machine? <br /><br />8) When Mrs. Weasley comes home from the hospital after Mr. Weasley passes the crisis point, she says that Bill is with his father now, having taken "the morning off work." The <span style="font-style: italic;">morning?</span> Your dad gets 85% killed by an enormous evil mind-meld horcrux snake and you don't use up a whole sick day?! C'mon, Bill!<br /><br />9) I like the hints J. K. drops (which you might miss the first time around) that Kreacher has left Sirius's house for a while. That's how you foreshadow without just giving away the plot in advance, <span style="font-style: italic;">Stephenie Meyer.</span><br /><br />10) Hermione skips skiing with her parents over Christmas to hang out with Harry and the Weasleys at Grimauld Place. This continues the books' minor theme that Hermione really, really could not care less about her parents.<br /><br />11) One of my favorite illustrations of the wizard/Muggle divide is when Mr. Weasley hesitantly tells his wife that he's been experimenting with Muggle remedies for his snake bite wounds: "Well . . . well, I don't know whether you know what--what stitches are?"<br />"It sounds as though you've been trying to sew your skin back together," said Mrs. Weasley with a snort of mirthless laughter, "but even you, Arthur, wouldn't be <span style="font-style: italic;">that </span>stupid--"<br />And then Harry hightails it out of there in anticipation of a major Mrs. Weasley conniption.<br /><br />12) Does Dumbledore ever do anything more awesome than when escapes his office out from the Minister of Magic's nose? ("Well--it's just that you seem to be laboring under the delusion that I am going to--what is the phrase? 'Come quietly.' I am afraid I am not going to come quietly at all, Cornelius.") I submit that he does not.<br /><br />13) Harry's dad, as we learn from Snape's worst memory, was a horrible human being as a teenager. Is that what Harry would have been like if his parents had lived, and he'd been a regular, rich, talented kid instead of a poor grubby orphan? . . . Maybe his mom's influence would have prevented it.<br /><br />14) This book also contains Hagrid's most awesome moment: when, Hulk-like, he beats down a half-dozen Aurors. Go Hagrid.<br /><br />15) Unfortunately, this book also contains the stupid Hagrid development, Grawp. The worst thing about Grawp is not that Hagrid is stupid for trying to keep his giant brother in the woods like some particularly horrible pet, but (as Neal as pointed out to me) that Grawp has no bearing on any plot developments in the future. What was the point of Grawp, J. K.? What was the point?<br /><br />16) When Dumbledore finally spills the beans about the prophecy that foretold that Harry would have to kill Voldemort or vice versa, Harry asks what power he could have that could enable him to beat Voldemort. As we know, the answer is love. (No, really.) The weird part is that Dumbledore introduces this answer by saying "There is a room n the Department of Mysteries . . . that is kept locked at all times. It contains a force that is at once more wonderful and more terrible than death, than human intelligence, than forces of nature. It is also, perhaps, the most mysterious of the many subjects for study that reside there." <br /><br />Really? I mean, I believe love is powerful and all, but . . . there's a <span style="font-style: italic;">room?</span> Of love? The Love Room? I assume they don't call it that, as it would probably give people the wrong impression, but still.<br /><br />17) Finally, here are some more quotes that I think are funny:<br /><br />"How do you remember stuff like that?" asked Ron, looking at her in admiration.<br />"I listen, Ron," said Hermione with a touch of asperity.<br /><br />[Re: Ernie Macmillan, the pompous Hufflepuff kid (a minor character I enjoy more upon each re-reading)] He looked around impressively, as though waiting for people to cry, "Surely not!"<br /><br />"Dangerous?" said Hagrid, looking genially bemused. "Don' be silly, I wouldn' give hey anythin' dangerous! I mean, all righ', they can look after themselves--"<br /><br />[Hermione thanks the boys for her Christmas presents:] "Thanks for the book, Harry!" she said happily. "I've been wanting that <span style="font-style: italic;">New Theory of Numerology</span> for ages! And that perfume is really unusual, Ron."<br />"No problem," said Ron.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-44704195819021189472010-12-09T17:55:00.003-06:002010-12-09T20:42:46.075-06:00Harry Potter Thoughts: Goblet of FireI'm frustrated with myself because I know a lot of things occurred to me as I re-read <span style="font-style: italic;">Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, </span>but then I forgot them. I'll try to take notes when I read the final three books.<br /><br />Anyway.<br /><br />This has always been my favorite book of the series. It never fails to impress me how from the time Harry enters the maze at the final of the Triwizard Cup until Dumbledore finishes interrogating Barty Crouch, jr., it's edge-of-your-seat, can't-put-it-down reading. It doesn't let up. It's awesome.<br /><br />It doesn't hurt that this is the book where we finally start getting some Ron-Hermione tension of the romantic variety. I love Ron + Hermione.<br /><br />More thoughts:<br /><br />1. Fake Moody's plan is so needlessly elaborate. He gained Harry's trust pretty early on and, since Dumbledore wasn't suspicious of him, could have just lured Harry away from Hogwarts and disapparated with him or whatever. Heck, he could have gotten Harry onto a bus to Little Hangleton with some vague promise of investigation or adventure or whatever. Harry's easy.<br /><br />2. Neal wanted me to point out that this is the book where Hermione's character starts to get morally comprised. Um, Hermione, sweetie? It's not OK to imprison a human woman (disguised as a beetle or not) in a little glass jar for a week or two because she annoyed you or whatever. There's also the blackmail aspect to be concerned about, but the imprisonment thing is worrisome enough.<br /><br />3. Harry and the other champions have to compete in three events, each of which probably take less than two hours. So they get out of final exams and the entire Quidditch season gets cancelled because . . . ? I mean, other than getting J. K. out of writing Quidditch matches, of course.<br /><br />4. While I'm on the subject of Quidditch, I might as well address the subject of Quidditch. It's one of the real weaknesses of the entire series. Rowling admitted in interviews that she doesn't really know much about sports and that the matches were chores for her to write. The former point is not surprising--Quidditch is a pretty terrible sport.<br /><br />People on flying broomsticks throwing balls through very high hoops? That's great. That's a great sport for wizards to play. Adding a second kind of ball that zooms around trying to knock players off their brooms? Also great! It's funny, very much in keeping with the little absurdities of Rowling's wizarding universe. But the snitch, you guys. The snitch.<br /><br />The fact that catching the snitch both ends the game and earns the catching team 150 points (when each goal is only worth 10) pretty much ruins the whole thing. <span style="font-style: italic;">Yes, </span>in Goblet of Fire, we see a team lose despite getting the snitch. I know. That is, however, the only time we see that happen, and you would think it would indeed be pretty rare. It's just too much.<br /><br />The snitch is, of course, a device that allows Harry to be an indisputable, individual hero even in a team game. Quidditch works great as a plot device, but as a sport, it's awful.<br /><br />Also, if it's such a big deal, why does Hogwarts only hold six games a year (when the tournament isn't canceled, of course)? And if there are only four teams at what seems to be the only wizarding school in the British Isles, how can the British Isles also support at least one professional Quidditch league? Wouldn't it be easier to make it onto a professional squad than a Hogwarts house team?<br /><br />Those problems all pale beside the snitch, though.<br /><br />5. Back to the Triwizard Tournament--it sounds like a really terrible spectator event. The dragon-fighting contest would be pretty cool to watch, obviously, but the others? In the second task, the crowd had to just sit there for over an hour waiting for the champions to emerge from the lake. In defense of Muggles--we would have set up some dang underwater video cameras so we didn't have to rely on Merperson testimony to find out what happened down there. The third task would have been pretty cool to watch if the crowd were high enough to see everything that happened in the maze, but they weren't. Again, J. K. Rowling: not great with the sports.<br /><br />6. Honest question: how are supposed to feel about house elves? Hermione makes what seem to be extremely good points about how they're slave labor since, after all, they're slave labor. However, her crusade is played for laughs, and none of the other characters agree with her. Ron and his brothers are from a pretty relaxed and groovy wizard family, but they see no problem with how house elves are treated. All the house elves we meet besides Dobby are A-OK with doing unpaid, unquestioning labor, and even Dobby would rather be paid a pittance than a fair wage. Dumbledore, for agreeing to pay Dobby, seems the closest to Hermione's point of view. Even then, it seems like he's being indulgent, not any kind of activist.<br /><br /><br />Maybe it's just as well that I didn't take notes, since this was plenty long as is.<br /><br />It'll be just a bit until I start Order of the Pheonix, I think, because I'm halfway through the Twilight "saga." Speaking of, should I share my thoughts on that? I'd kind of like to, but there are already lots of places on the internet where you can read criticism of <span style="font-style: italic;">Twilight.</span>Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-56619355606508305602010-12-03T11:08:00.004-06:002010-12-03T11:17:55.703-06:00My Hair is Out of ControlI've been saying this for months, but I have <span style="font-style: italic;">got</span> to get a haircut.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCSATI-7wuUYqZyHOI-RIhkXNxQJgxGJy93oIw4Z7hNe5noiOROu_7lUeuMr7BRGJexpbnfDp6v0uoVcuZHw2Ayg6kU471wacRjrsBwGCmYINJgaq2pXFIGPmFSW-Ultm94_Ei6RvHf7cD/s1600/hair+1.JPG"><img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 300px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCSATI-7wuUYqZyHOI-RIhkXNxQJgxGJy93oIw4Z7hNe5noiOROu_7lUeuMr7BRGJexpbnfDp6v0uoVcuZHw2Ayg6kU471wacRjrsBwGCmYINJgaq2pXFIGPmFSW-Ultm94_Ei6RvHf7cD/s400/hair+1.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5546505153797101666" border="0" /></a>I like having long hair, but "elbow-length" is pushing it.<br /><br />I mentioned this on Twitter, but I weirded out a baby (she's about a year and half old) with my hair last month. She was playing with my ponytail, so I was like, here--let me take it down so you can see it all--and she just <span style="font-style: italic;">stared </span>at me. Like, "Dude, I don't even know what I'm <span style="font-style: italic;">seeing </span>right now . . . What is happening?" kind of stare. (On the other hand, though, my niece Eliza had a pretty good time using my hair for braiding practice.)<br /><br />Places I could fit in right now:<br /><br />Woodstock<br />Amish Country<br />The Garden of Eden<br />The Addams' family mansion:<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUjg2usgxeMezgO2hqsBn3Tkp8JjQea-gxqr_j5aY8tzeMBh4HbXPX2hsts2hTTyPFLKmJvi0Vxau-n4b1pjvNwT3yXem48DlpVKiOeFOSrOvW6uTIVCYb11yi0Q7MgD023EyvwQJE6DPQ/s1600/hair+2.JPG"><img style="display: block; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 300px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhUjg2usgxeMezgO2hqsBn3Tkp8JjQea-gxqr_j5aY8tzeMBh4HbXPX2hsts2hTTyPFLKmJvi0Vxau-n4b1pjvNwT3yXem48DlpVKiOeFOSrOvW6uTIVCYb11yi0Q7MgD023EyvwQJE6DPQ/s400/hair+2.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5546505527583784242" border="0" /></a>Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-46397383094171431082010-11-19T22:07:00.050-06:002010-11-20T08:51:54.737-06:00Neal's Epic-ly Spoilerific and Spoilerific-ly Epic Deathly Hallows Review<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Grade: B</span> (I think Rachel would rate it higher, but I'll let her explain that later)<br />So, this afternoon, Rachel and I got to take in the latest installment of the Harry Potter film franchise. I went in concerned, with my expectations fairly low. I had read some decidedly mixed reviews.<br /><br />(Click above on the title of this post to continue my spoiler-filled review.)<br /><span id="fullpost"><br /><br />The reviews I saw tended to offer the following criticisms:<br /><br />-<em>Holy crap, that was a lot of camping<br /><br /></em>-<em>Kind of boring, also, did anyone notice all the camping?!<br /><br /></em>-<em>The young actors couldn't hold their own. Also, you know, the camping thing.<br /><br /></em>Having now seen the film, I don't think any of these criticisms are particularly fair. For one, there <em>is </em>a lot of camping in the first 2/3 of <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Deathly Hallows</span>, completely unavoidable for the filmmakers, at least to a certain degree. Secondly, I think all the young actors did fairly well, but more on that below.<br /><br />As for the plot, anyone geeky enough to start reading a Harry Potter film review on their friend's blog has probably read the book. The film is actually very faithful to the book.<br /><br />After quick establishing shots of the Trio at their respective homes (including Hermione's), we get Voldemort's meeting with his Death Eaters, escape to the Burrow, wedding, escape from the wedding, Grimmauld Place, break-in to the Ministry, camping, camping, camping, fight, Ron leaves, sad camping, sad camping, sad camping, Godric's Hollow, snake attack, sad camping, Ron returns, Horcrux destruction, slightly-happier camping, Lovegoods', Deathly Hallows explanation, chase, capture, torture, escape, death . . .<br /><br />As you can see from my overall grade, the film pulls most of this off quite well. Yes, even the camping. Here's my breakdown of what I liked, didn't like, and thought was just OK:<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">The Good:</span><br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Daniel Radcliffe:</span> This isn't too surprising. I think Radcliffe is an all-around solid actor who has generally done a good job playing Harry. Here, he hits all the necessary emotional beats, without overplaying them. Seeing his parents' graves for the first time, Harry tears up and is clearly moved, choking out a glum "Merry Christmas, Hermione" while Hermione puts her arm around him. Radcliffe avoids the chance to create an Oscar clip by weeping and yelling "Noooooooo!!!" while falling to his knees. Well played, Radcliffe.<br /><br />He's funny too. The scene where Radcliffe has to play six of Harry's own doppelgangers is very, very funny, and well-acted. You can actually tell who's who just based on Radcliffe's posture and facial expression.<br /><br />Finally, it must be said that he has excellent on-screen chemistry with Emma Watson (more on that below), which works to the film's advantage during the admittedly long 'sad camping' phase after Ron's departure.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Emma Watson:</span> OK, this is a surprise. For most of the previous six films, Emma Watson has gotten by on an often-terrible combination of one 'concerned' face, one 'scared' face, a 'sad face,' disconcertingly-rapid eyebrow movements, and more recently the fact that she's (at the age of 20) very, very pretty. Please understand that I mean this in the least-pervy way possible. Rachel and I had a whole conversation about this on the way home. In this film, the filmmakers really go out of their way to try to make the Trio look scruffy, tired, and worn out. The boys are both dirty and bestubbled for most of the proceedings. Hermione, on the other hand, looks all freckly and adorable no matter what. Don't underestimate the importance of this for her future career as an actress. Other pretty actresses have gotten by on less talent.<br /><br />Here, though, Rachel and I both thought she did a good job. Like Radcliffe, she hits all the necessary emotional beats, from sobbing over a bleeding and unconscious Ron to screaming and writhing in agony as Bellatrix carves the word 'mudblood' into her arm (yes, this actually happens). Life Radcliffe, she has some nice, quietly-played moments where she avoids the temptation to overact. Well played, Watson.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Ministry Break-In: </span>This is one of most compelling, and often funny, segments of the film. As I'm sure you know, the Trio have to disguise themselves as Ministry employees in order to break in and steal the the Slytherin locket Horcrux from Dolores Umbridge. The reason this series of scenes works so well is that the adult actors who play the disguised Trio all do a great job. Especially David O'Hara, who plays Harry and is without question the secret MVP of the movie. It's hard to explain unless you see it, but he's hilariously convincing as Harry/Radcliffe in disguise.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Harry-Hermione Slow Dance:</span> When I first read in an early review of the movie that Harry cheers up a depressed Hermione (post-Ron departure) by slow dancing with her to a Nick Cave song, I assumed this was going to be Harry Potter's biggest "Hey! Is that the Fonz on water skis?!" moment since Grawp snatched up Hermione in <em>Order of the Phoenix</em> (Man, was that a stupid scene). And yet, it works. It really works. Radcliffe and Watson deserve all the credit in the world. They clearly have a very real, lived-in friendship that comes across nicely on screen. A surprisingly-touching little moment that could have easily seemed awkward and forced. Well-played, Radcliffe and Watson.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Destroying the Slytherin Locket Horcrux:</span> I'm a little torn here, because this scene ultimately falls a little flat once the Horcrux is destroyed. It makes the 'good list' all the same because it's the source of one of the most incredibly-palpable moments of "is this actually happening!!!?? IS THIS ACTUALLY HAPPENING!!!????" tension I've ever experienced in a packed movie theater.<br /><br />After Ron rescues Harry and retrieves the sword of Gryffindor from the frozen pond, Harry opens the locket using Parseltongue. At this point, an evil, scarier version of the smoke monster from <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Lost</span> explodes out of the locket, sending Ron and Harry flying backwards in opposite directions. Horcrux-Voldemort's taunting of Ron culminates in the appearance of shiny, evil versions of Harry and Hermione who tell Ron that he's worthless, and then proceed to full-on make out . . . in the nude. How nude? This is a conversation from the car ride home:<br /><br />Me: Am I taking crazy pills, or was there actually some side boob there?<br />Rachel: Oh, there was totally side boob!! IT WAS BANANAS!!<br /><br />Again, I can't stress enough how fun it was to be in a packed theater of Harry Potter fans who were collectively losing their crap. Also, kudos to Radcliffe and Watson for really, really not holding back. Even if we all realize later that this scene was way overwrought (very possible), it was still an incredibly-enjoyable theater moment.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Deathly Hallows Animation:</span> This was completely unexpected and very cool. When the Trio visit a clearly-depressed and distracted Xenophilius Lovegood for info on the strange symbol Hermione keeps coming across, he has Hermione read 'The Tale of the Three Brothers' from the book Dumbledore left her. Hermione's narration is accompanied by some really cool animation that explains the origins of the three Deathly Hallows. One of the nicest surprises of the film. Of course, everything goes downhill for the film after this scene (a full rant on that below).<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Little Moments:</span> The filmmakers do a great job of building in little moments to reward fans of the books. Harry does wake up in Grimmauld Place to find that Ron and Hermione fell asleep holding hands (and yes, Ron is on the floor). Ron and Harry speak appreciatively about the little portable fires Hermione is so good at making (a nice call back to the first book). We also get some great Fred and George stuff early in the film ("I'm holey, Fred"). The list could go on. Good job, filmmakers.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Honorable Mentions:</span> Godric's Hollow snake fight, Hermione erasing her parents' memories of her.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">The Just OK:</span><br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Rupert Grint:</span> Yeah, I know, he's an easy target. The fact that he's a slightly odd-looking guy is not aided by the fact that he continues to sport one of the worst haircuts any actor has ever had. Grint has been blamed by many fans for the often extreme wimpification of Ron that occurred in many of the earlier films. While much of that comes down to the screenwriters and directors, it's still easy to dislike Grint for his love of goofy facial expressions and high-pitched whining.<br /><br />And yet, by the halfway point of this film, my opinion of him had completely turned around. He's very good in the early stages of the film, especially in a scene where he confronts Harry in one of his inevitable "No one else is going to die for me!" moods. He's equally good at playing Ron's descent into paranoia and resentment under the influence of the Slytherin locket Horcrux. He, Radcliffe, and Watson are all great in the big argument scene.<br /><br />Then, he returns, and while he does a passable job in the Horcrux destruction scene, things quickly go downhill from there (More on that below).<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Ron-Hermione Reunion:</span> So, once Ron and Harry have vanquished the smoke monster, they head back to camp to meet up with Hermione, but not before Ron quips, "just think, only three more to go!" Parenthetically, I was a little disappointed they cut the whole "Dude, seriously, she's like my sister, bro" conversation Harry and Ron have at that point in the book.<br /><br />Meanwhile, back at the tent, Hermione awakes to find that Ron has returned to the Scooby Gang. After the requisite slapping and hitting of Ron, Hermione looks on coldly as Ron explains how he found his way back to Harry and Hermione.<br /><br />*incredibly cheesy music begins to swell in the background*<br /><br />Now, keep in mind, the movie had actually been pretty stellar up to this point (at least in my opinion), but now for the first time I thought "uh oh . . . "<br /><br />Ron, accompanied by a painfully overwrought score, explains how he heard Hermione's voice on the radio, opened the Deluminator, a ball of light touched his heart, bla, bla, bla. None of this is really Grint's fault. He does a decent job with the speech, and it's straight out of the book, but the music kind of makes it all fall flat. Meh.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Dobby:</span> Dobby of course makes his triumphant return in this film, and the filmmakers do a good job of working him into the story before the whole "And now, for some reason, Dobby is here!" rescue at Malfoy Manor. The CG animation looks good, and the voice actor does a fine job, but the film often deflates essential tension so that Dobby can have all his big moments. In the film, it's kind of Dobby's own fault he takes a knife to the chest. At the climax of the fight in Malfoy Manor, with Ron, Harry, a rescued Hermione, and the goblin all gathered together and ready to disapparate, Dobby inexplicably pauses to give his cheesy "Dobby is a free elf!!" speech. Many of the people in the theater loved this, meanwhile all I could think was: DISAPPARATE! YOU IDIOT!!!!<br /><br />Dobby's death is handled well, with Radcliffe convincingly crying over what was (I assume) a rubber doll with golf balls for eyes. I don't know. I can only get so worked up over a CG muppet. Meh.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">The Villains:</span> I'm lumping all of these characters together, because the problems are more with the writing and directing than with the actors. Ralph Fiennes is terrific as Voldemort (and I actually didn't really like him that much in <em>Goblet of Fire</em>), but we don't get to see much of him after the big Death Eater sit-down that starts the film. Helena Bonham Carter does a good job as Bellatrix, especially during her creepy confrontation with Hermione, but she is horribly undermined by her wardrobe. I'm sorry, but a woman wearing a set of fake teeth and Elvira hair can only be so scary.<br /><br />The main villains for much of the film are actually the 'Snatchers,' bandits who maraud the countryside looking for fugitives. Ultimately, they're kind of a dud as a group of villains. The main Snatcher is basically presented as a Hermione-sniffing pervert. Weird? Yes. Slightly unsettling? Maybe. Scary? Not really.<br /><br />This is why <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The Lord of the Rings</span> had Orcs.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Slightly Weird/Unintentionally Funny: </span>Neither Ron nor Harry gives two farts about Hermione's parents. Despite frequent melancholy statements like, "I used to come here with Mum and Dad, of course, they wouldn't remember that now, or me . . . " Ron and Harry never inquire further or show the slightest interest in why she's so upset.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">The Bad:</span><br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Chase and Capture:</span> After their meeting with Xenophilius Lovegood goes south, the Trio have to quickly disapparate to avoid getting caught by Death Eaters. They reappear in some woods where they run right into a set of Snatchers, led by the Hermione-Sniffing Pervert.<br /><br />"Snatch them!" he says. (audible groan)<br /><br />And so, they run. But why though? Couldn't they grab hands and just disapparate again? Apparition might secretly be one of the biggest logic/continuity errors in the books. When I think about it, I'm not sure I really know all the rules. Anyway, maybe the Trio are just low on MP (appreciative chuckle from those of us who played video games in the early '90's), but they decide to run. There is some cool camera work here, but they of course are captured fairly easily, with Hermione disfiguring Harry so he won't be recognized.<br /><br />It's not how easily they're captured that deflates all tension from this set of scenes, it's how easily they're <em>held</em> captive. Like Superman, it turns out that Harry, Ron, and Hermione have but one weakness as wizards who have undergone six years of magical training. So, what is Harry Potter's kryptonite?<br /><br />Having his arms or shirt held lightly from behind . . . yeah, real heroic. After some Hermione sniffing, the Hermione-Sniffing Pervert recognizes Harry and decides that he's taking these fugitives straight to the Big Boss.<br /><br />When next we see our indomitable heroes, they are being led glumly towards the front gates of Malfoy Manor (Voldemort HQ). Knowing that torture and death surely await them inside, what do our heroes do to attempt escape? Nothing. Are they tied up? No. Magically restrained or incapacitated in any way? No. You see, the Snatchers are lightly pushing them from behind. It would be impossible for them to turn around and try to punch out one of their captors, grab a wand, or disapparate. Wait, why can't they disapparate again? This rant's just getting started . . .<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Malfoy Manor:</span> The Trio are led (rather easily) into Malfoy Manor and presented to a gleeful Bellatrix and Lucius Malfoy (played brilliantly as a drunken has-been by Jason Isaacs). Once they dispense with the "Is it really him, Draco?" business, Bellatrix recognizes the sword of Gryffindor in the hands of one of the Snatchers, and flips out. She instructs one of her goons (maybe it's Wormtail, I'd have to see it again) to take Harry and Ron down to the cellar, announcing her intentions to question Hermione about the sword.<br /><br />Now, in the book, aware that their friend is about to be brutally tortured, Ron and Harry have to be <em>dragged</em> kicking and screaming into to the cellar. In the movie, nope, their arms are being held from behind, so they're totally helpless. They allow themselves to be led rather meekly into their prison cell.<br /><br />This is where the scene falls tragically flat. Give credit to Helena Bonham Carter and Emma Watson, who both at least realized this was the climax of the movie. Emma Watson very convincingly howls in agony as Bellatrix questions her about the sword.<br /><br />In the book, Ron starts hysterically sobbing at the sound of Hermione's pain and physically hurls himself at the cellar door in a desperate attempt to escape. In the movie, Rupert Grint plays Ron as mildly concerned, at best. Movie Ron tugs lightly on the bars of the door and quickly concludes that they're locked in, so . . .<br /><br />All the tension created by Hermione's torment is completely deflated by Harry and Ron's weirdly calm and frankly, kind of lame reaction in the cellar. Then of course Dobby shows up to save the day and lets them out.<br /><br />We're then treated to a very short and perfunctory wand fight as Harry and Ron try to rescue Hermione. Once Dobby drops the chandelier on Bellatrix, Harry very easily takes the wands away from Draco (Seriously! It's the climactic fight of the movie, have the guys throw a few punches!), and they all disapparate.<br /><br />Just a disappointing conclusion to a good film. In the book, even with Dobby's help, Ron and Harry have to scrape and claw their way out of the cellar (including a deadly confrontation with Wormtail, who is easily dispatched by Dobby here). In the movie, it all goes kind of easy once Dobby shows up. Meh.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Final Thoughts:</span> Despite my epic rant about how disappointing and lame I found parts of the final twenty or so minutes, I overall really enjoyed the movie. David Yates is really good at directing quieter, character-driven moments, but he is not always as good at building and sustaining tension in action scenes. That makes me a little nervous about the finale, but we'll see.<br /><br />If any of you was brave or crazy enough to read the whole thing, let me know what you thought about the movie or my review in the comments.<br /></span>Nealhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16829844851564533213noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-25133176403855024522010-11-17T17:58:00.002-06:002010-11-17T20:43:05.516-06:00Harry Potter ThoughtsI decided that, in preparation for watching the new Harry Potter movie this Friday (we've got our tickets!), I should re-read all seven in order. (I meant to re-read the first six before the seventh one came out, but that didn't happen, so this will be the first time I've done the seven in a row.) I didn't budget quite enough time, so I won't be able to finish before the movie, but oh well. What I <span style="font-style: italic;">can </span>do is share some observations I've been making about the beginning of the story now that I know how it all ends.<br /><br />Here are some notions I've entertained, just having finished #3, <span style="font-style: italic;">Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban.</span><br /><br />1) J. K. didn't hide a ton of clues about the future in Book 1, but I enjoy the ones that are there. My favorite is Harry's creeping sensation that Snape can read minds.<br /><br />2) Draco Malfoy may be the worst-written character in the series. (At least through the first three books.) He is unrelentingly horrible--just no redeeming characteristics at all--yet in no way a threat. He never bests Harry at anything, and besides being a little dumb, is a <span style="font-style: italic;">huge </span>coward. It bothers me that Harry and his pals hardly ever have good comebacks for him, when he is nothing but comic relief. Example: Malfoy goes on and on and on and on about Harry fainting because of the dementors. But then he pulls a total drama queen when Buckbeak scratches him. <span style="font-style: italic;">How do Harry and Ron not kill him for that?</span> He gave them so much material!<br /><br />Let's contrast this with Snape: Snape is a mean, petty little man, but not only is he the secret hero in Book 1, he's also right a lot of the time. Yes, it's always wrong how he treats children (a grown man has no excuse to be that much of a bully to 11- and 12-year-olds), but he has a point when he talks about Harry being an inveterate rule-breaker and how Dumbledore unreasonably favors him. <br /><br />3) The climax of the <span style="font-style: italic;">Prisoner of Azkaban </span>movie is actually much better than the book's. Heresy, I know, but the structure is much tighter and more suspenseful in the film. In the book, there are only a few, fleeting high-pressure moments on Harry and Hermione when the go back in time; in the movie, the second run-through is (as I recall) more exciting the first. Good job, screenwriter and director.<br /><br />4) I really, really love the scene where Harry first meets Ron. It's so cute. Plus, it highlights one of the most interesting aspects of the Ron-Harry friendship: how each one is jealous of what the other has. (Ron wishes he had Harry's fame and money; Harry wishes he had Ron's family and wizarding-world knowledge.)<br /><br />5) I finally figured out how Harry could have gotten along with the Dursleys. I've always felt like there was <span style="font-style: italic;">something </span>he could do to try to live more peaceably with them, because although it's mostly their fault, it's a little him, too. "Keep a civil tongue in your head" clearly wouldn't be enough, though, since they're so horrible. But! Harry has lots of wizard money, and the Dursleys like regular money. He should have just converted some of his cash into some Muggle cash and paid them to be nicer to him. Heck, he could just have paid off Dudley, because Vernon and Petunia don't really get set off unless Dudley (or an owl of some sort) is involved. All he'd need to do was set an amount they (or he) would earn at the end of the summer if they avoided verbally and physically abusing him and decrease the amount any time they (or he) crossed the line. Harry's second-biggest life problem: solved.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1853776366845031479.post-78187665263668681462010-11-06T10:23:00.003-05:002010-11-06T10:29:30.880-05:00One Book I Did Not LikeAhoy there!<br /><br />In my first effort to get back in the blogging saddle, I'm going to repeat something I already wrote on the internet. Baby steps!<br /><br />I just finished this book called <span style="font-style: italic;">Lost States: True Stories of Texlahoma, Transylvania, and Other States That Never Made It. </span>As you will be able to tell from my Goodreads review, it did not live up to my expectations:<br /><br />I saw this book come through at my library, and I thought "What a great topic for a book!" And it is a great topic. It's too bad it was, in my opinion, really mishandled.<br /><br />The book has quite a bit of breadth (74 "states" are covered), but no depth. Each "state" gets two pages, one of which is a full-page map. The facing page contains more pictures (which are often only tangentially related to the topic); lots of tepid, uncreative jokes; and a little information. <br /><br />The maps range from interesting to out-and-out bad (one clearly has hand-drawn marker on it; one has Wyoming on the western border of Kansas--which is the reason I downgraded the book from two stars). I think there were . . . maybe four? historical facts that I learned from a 160-page book, but the history was, in places, just as bad as the maps (quote: "[George Washington] was the most popular and powerful man in the world." WILDLY FALSE. WILDLY.) <br /><br />I don't know who this book is aimed at. It doesn't give enough background information to teach much to American history novices (it would have helped a little if the order of the "states" were chronological instead of alphabetical), and it's too superficial to teach anything to people who already have solid American history background.<br /><br />In short, this is a book with the pace and tone of an Uncle John's Bathroom Reader, but without the depth or intelligence.Rachelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05062671427548399205noreply@blogger.com0